Life confuses me, people
confuse me. Sometimes I think I am the only sane person, adrift in a world of
lunacy. Nothing makes me feel this way more, than what I see on the Internet
and that pervasive part of our lives, Facebook.
It has often been observed
that the Internet magnifies human behaviour, whether for good or ill; human
social interaction is somehow exaggerated, becoming overblown and often
ridiculous. It is also sadly true that we now live in an age when any fool can
have their own website and thanks to social media, access a wider audience.
This blog and the fool writing it is proof of that.
It is some aspect of the
Internet and in particular Facebook, that is able to bring the flaws of human
behaviour so starkly into focus. It is remarkable how easy it is to make fools
of ourselves on the web, without actually realising how foolish we are. How
inhibition, etiquette and general good manners drift away from many users of
the magic keyboard.
With this in mind I offer the
reader three examples of conversations taken directly from Facebook, for
amusement and as a general example of the flaws to which I refer.
In this first example I
received a message referring to my then profile picture, an ancient statue in
Rutland. My reply consisting of a weblink to the history of the statute, was
obviously unsatisfactory but was it really necessary to reply with an expletive?
Because I have been stalked
on the web and because I have had security issues in the past, I now routinely
screen all friend requests. I send out a basic and standard message asking
anyone friend requesting me on Facebook to introduce themselves, to show a genuine
wish to interact, to communicate and to prove they are not spam-bots.
Some people reply and
introduce themselves, some reply with a rude message but most ignore my
message. These after a decent period of waiting for the reply that never comes,
are deleted from the pending queue. In this second example of poor Internet
etiquette, we are introduced to the friend collector. That peculiar individual
who considers the quantity of friends, to be of more value than the quality of
friendship.
Even today I am amused by the
inference that I should have been grateful to have received his request and
disappointed that he wasn’t going to add me. His final ‘sorry mate’ still makes
me smile.
My final example, more recent
and perhaps even more peculiar; is one of those individuals who attempts to
claim a mutual friendship in support of a friend request. In this case however,
realising I am not so easily fooled and that I want more by way of
clarification. They choose to both withdraw and to block me.
This is an action I cannot
fail to see as being highly suspicious. Were they a spammer, a hacker or a
potential stalker? I don’t much care but their behaviour confirms how correct I
was to be wary.
I have a minor qualification
in psychology (an 'A' level equivalent and nothing special) but to understand the behaviour witnessed on social media, I
would need at least a foundation degree. So much of what I experience, whether
viewed from a sociological or psychological perspective, is well beyond my own
comprehension.
So in signing off this
instalment of my irregular blog, what can I say dear reader? Oh of course I
know the very thing; so until next time, blessings and moonbeams darlings.
I do love your blog! I have to say unless I know them IRL, i.e we have physically met,and had a conversation ... oh and I like them, or I have talked to them in a group.. I don't add people.
ReplyDeleteMoonbeams, rainbow and unicorns farts ... *sparkles*...
Anyone who calls me hunny would be an automatic block. My friends would know I hate being called hun, hunny, hen or any other semi patronising word thinly veiled as an endearment.
ReplyDelete